RE: Is this supposed to be?

Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 , Design, Deployment, Clustering and troubleshooting related archives

RE: Is this supposed to be?

Post by usenet » Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:22 pm

I am not sure, but it would be better option to remove node2 from possible
owners list thats it.

"ed" wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> exchange 2007 CCR, node1 is acive node. If I do not want resources to
> failover to node2, so I choose "stop the the clustered server", then reboot
> the node1, then it shows its owner is node2. is this supposed to be? If
> yes, what should I do if I do not want it to failover to node2 when I reboot
> the node1 since node 2 is in different site accross the WAN link?
>
> Thank you!
>
More available at Technology Forums
usenet
 
Posts: 80094
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:14 am

Return to Exchange



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests